BY DANNY
O'ROURKE
STAFF WRITER
LOS ANGELES -- On Thursday in second
day of testimony in the second Painseeker Murder Trial
in Los Angeles Superior Court, Assistant District
Attorney Thomas Andrews called on LAPD forensics expert
Lisa Finnegan to prove that Sharon Wolfe was responsible
for the murder of her client, rising music star Raychel
Wagner.
Following the day's testimony, many
believed that Finnegan's credibility with the jury will
be a major issue with the jury in deciding the case, as
the defense hammered away at the evidence and the
inability of the police to find a suspect in their
initial investigation.
In gruesome testimony, Finnegan
provided a blow-by-blow description of Raychel Wagner's
last minutes. She stated that the confrontation
started in the living room and spilled down the hallway
and into the kitchen, where it turned deadly.
Finnegan concluded that Raychel Wagner died
from loss of blood due to the fact that she had been
slashed or stabbed 23 times with a broken bottle of Jose Cuervo Gold tequila. She stated that the weapon was
ascertained by reconstructing the numerous fragments in
the kitchen and from the size and type of wounds on the
victim. Finnegan went on to describe many of the
wounds as defensive since they were found on her hands and
lower arms. She stated that there were also
significant wounds on her abdomen, neck, and head.
Recapping LAPD Detective Kevin
Wakefield's testimony from Wednesday, Finnegan detailed
how the evidence upheld the prosecution's case that
Sharon Wolfe was responsible for the murder of Raychel
Wagner. As she had stated in the first Painseeker
trial against Laura Douglass, Finnegan stated that
fingerprints on several items at the crime scene
indicated that they were handled by Raychel Wagner,
Sharon Wolfe, or both.
On cross examination, Wolfe's defense
attorney, Wendy Timmerman, immediately asserted that
Finnegan's testimony was biased due to her affiliation
with the LAPD, and that part of her job description was
to testify before trials and convince the jury of the
prosecution's case. Timmerman drove the point home
by asking if the truth had ever gotten in the way of her
testimony. When the expected objection from
Andrews came, Timmerman withdrew the question.
In oftentimes technical questioning,
Timmerman also hammered at Finnegan's confidence in the
quality of Wolfe's prints on the evidence in question.
Timmerman repeatedly asked about the possibility that
the fingerprints had been left prior to the time of the
murder, specifically at the beginning of the day.
Timmerman hinted that she had her own expert willing to
testify against Finnegan. However, Finnegan
remained firm in her stance.
Timmerman turned to questioning
Finnegan on her confidence in the quality of the
evidence in general against Sharon Wolfe. When
Finnegan stated that she had full confidence in the
evidence, Timmerman asked Finnegan why charges were not
pressed against her client earlier. Timmerman
asserted that all of the evidence that had been
presented had been obtained early in the investigation;
however, charges were not filed until over a year later.
When Finnegan balked at the question, Timmerman asked
about the murder weapon, the broken tequila bottle, and
how she could be so confident in her case when the
murder weapon, and any incriminating fingerprints, had
never been recovered. Finnegan stated that she
believed the evidence that had been recovered from the
crime scene was sufficient reason to be confident in the
case.
"Then I guess you're a far more
trusting person than I am. Then again, you're paid
to be, aren't you?" Timmerman replied, before
telling Judge Michael Rodriguez that she had no further
questions.
When asked if he feared that
Timmerman's cross examination had eroded Finnegan's
credibility as Les Levin's had done in the Douglass
trial, Assistant District Attorney Thomas Andrews was
quick to discern between the two attorneys.
"While I disagree with her, I respect
Ms. Timmerman and the job she has done representing her
client. Les Levin did not cross examine Ms.
Finnegan in the previous trial, he just threw a tantrum
in court."
"Besides, " he added before leaving,
"I don't believe that either lawyer did anything to keep
the jury from believing in the defendant's guilt."
The week is scheduled to conclude
with testimony from Sharon Wolfe's ex-boyfriend Geoffrey
MacIntyre.
|