Related Links

Read "Morning Sickness"

Access the PDF Version of "Morning Sickness"

Submit Your Own Commentary for "Morning Sickness" Through the Poetry Commentary Form

Return to the Poetry Index

Lance Wagner's Commentary
On initial reaction Morning Sickness can easily be mistaken as a description of waking up either hung over or in withdrawal.  While a hasty reading may confirm the fact, further inspection reveals this to be something similar, yet separate.  The final two lines are the key.  "I rise/awaken" bring forth the actual framework of the poem at the end instead of the beginning.  This poem clearly deals with the difficulty of "waking up" to the truth.  While the first four stanzas show the horrors of "morning" Raychel defies these horrors and stands in the end.  A very uplifting poem despite the initial imagery.

Laura Douglass' Commentary
I disagree with part of Lance's commentary.  While keying on the last two lines of the last stanza, he misread the last stanza as a whole.  While Raychel (or the author if you prefer) rises, she does it in a completely defensive position.  Therefore, while I agree that the poem is about waking up to the truth, I disagree that it is uplifting.

Sharon Wolfe's Commentary
I never read this poem before (or heard Raychel read it) so I may be at a disadvantage to others, but I have tried to wake Raychel up to get her to the studio on time.  Raychel does not sleep.  She hibernates.  I suspect this poem has been blown WAY out of proportion.

Painseeker Reader Anis Nin's Commentary (06-12-2001)
I agree with Laura on this poem. For most traumatized people waking up to the truth is painful rather than uplifting. Generally I see that Raychel had her convictions although they were not well known to others. Perhaps she developed this outlook by covering up her true self and therefore who she really was never was revealed except in her poetry. Poetry is a nature you are born with, not something that one develops.  Though it can be trained within time, the talent must always exist. Sharon seems to be deflecting on the art of understanding poetry in itself, because she objectifies this work with the woman as she knew her. My point being that most artists portray this image of self employ to crucify their convictions within. So therefore it is easy to portray this as mere writing rather than true experience. The greatest thing about writing is, it can be fictional or fact without showing it's true face.

Painseeker Reader Chelsea Jones' Commentary (06-09-2002)
I really enjoyed your great poems.

 
     
 

© 2001-2008 Matthew D. Noncek